AI-Based Prediction of Intimacy Decline from Dyadic Attachment and Stress Patterns

Authors

    Büşra Kavla Department of Psychology, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, İstanbul, Türkiye
    Nurdan Sandıkçı Department of Psychology, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey
    Mehmet Yüksel * Department of Psychology, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul, Türkiye mehmet-yuksel@msgsu.edu.tr

Keywords:

AI-Based, Intimacy, Dyadic Attachment, Stress Patterns

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate an artificial intelligence–based model capable of predicting intimacy decline in romantic couples using dyadic attachment orientations and individual and shared stress patterns. The study employed a longitudinal, correlational design with a predictive modeling framework. Married and long-term cohabiting couples from Turkey participated as dyads, with both partners independently completing validated self-report measures of attachment anxiety and avoidance, perceived individual stress, dyadic stress, and relational intimacy. Data were collected at baseline and at a six-month follow-up to capture changes in intimacy over time. After data preprocessing and dyadic feature construction, multiple supervised machine learning algorithms were trained and validated using cross-validation procedures to predict intimacy decline as both a categorical and continuous outcome. The predictive models demonstrated strong performance, with ensemble-based algorithms achieving the highest classification accuracy and area under the curve values in distinguishing couples with declining intimacy from those with stable intimacy. Inferential feature analyses indicated that attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, dyadic stress, and interaction terms between attachment insecurity and stress were the most influential predictors. Models incorporating dyadic discrepancy indicators consistently outperformed those based solely on individual-level features, indicating significant partner interdependence effects. Higher combined levels of attachment insecurity and stress were associated with greater magnitude of intimacy decline over time. The findings indicate that intimacy decline can be accurately predicted using AI-based models that integrate dyadic attachment and stress variables, supporting the view that intimacy erosion emerges from complex, interactive relational processes. These results highlight the potential of artificial intelligence to inform early identification and prevention strategies in couple and family interventions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abebe, S. Y., Goldsby, E. A., & Hall, G. B. (2022). Commentary: Infant Mortality Among African Americans, Using Life Course Perspective to Encourage Transformation. Family & community health, 45(3), 160-162. https://doi.org/10.1097/fch.0000000000000325

Calleja‐Agius, J., & Attard, M. (2024). Will Science Alone Save Your Fertility? The International Journal of Prenatal & Life Sciences, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.24946/ijpls/16042024

Costa‐Cordella, S., & Luyten, P. (2024). Mentalizing-Based Healthcare: Towards a Relational Paradigm for Chronic Illness Management. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k82qg

Damabi, N. M., Sadatmahalleh, S. J., Moini, A., Nasiri, M., & Ozgoli, G. (2022). Comparison of Psycho-Sexual Factors and the Quality of Life Between Breastfeeding and Non- Breastfeeding Women During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2261419/v1

Davies, P. T., Thompson, M. J., Li, Z., & Sturge‐Apple, M. L. (2022). The Cognitive Costs and Advantages of Children’s Exposure to Parental Relationship Instability: Testing an Evolutionary-Developmental Hypothesis. Developmental Psychology, 58(8), 1485-1499. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001381

Dresp, B. (2023). From Reward to ≪em>Anhedonia : ≪/Em>Dopamine Function in the Global Mental Health Context. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202308.0072.v1

Gee, D. G. (2022). Neurodevelopmental Mechanisms Linking Early Experiences and Mental Health: Translating Science to Promote Well-Being Among Youth. American psychologist, 77(9), 1033-1045. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001107

Grave, R. B. d., Hasselman, F., & Bijleveld, E. (2022). From Work Stress to Disease: A Computational Model. PLoS One, 17(2), e0263966. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263966

Graziano, F., Mastrokoukou, S., Cattelino, E., Rollè, L., & Calandri, E. (2024). Conflict and Intimacy in Emerging Adults’ Romantic Relationships and Depressive Symptoms: The Mediating Role of Identity and Couple Satisfaction. Behavioral Sciences, 14(11), 977. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14110977

Hruschak, J., Palopoli, A. C., Thomason, M. E., & Trentacosta, C. J. (2022). Maternal‐fetal Attachment, Parenting Stress During Infancy, and Child Outcomes at Age 3 years. Infant Mental Health Journal Infancy and Early Childhood, 43(5), 681-694. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.22004

Janssen, P. G., Stoltz, S., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Ee, E. v. (2025). Effects of the After Deployment Adaptive Parenting Tools Intervention on Social Functioning in Veterans and Their Partners: A Pilot Study. Family Process, 64(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.70046

Li, C. (2023). The Effect of Rumination on the Stability of Intimate Relationships. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 27(1), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/27/20231127

Liang, K., Yang, Y. H., Chen, K., Lv, F., & Du, L. (2024). The Risk and Protective Factors on the Mental Health of Healthcare Workers During the Lockdown Period Due to Covid-19 Pandemic. Scientific reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62288-5

Navabinejad, S., Rostami, M., & Parsakia, K. (2024). Influences of Family Structure and Intimacy on Emotional Divorce: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. JPRFC, 23-30. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jprfc.2.1.5

Newcomb, M. E., Swann, G., Macapagal, K., Sarno, E. L., Whitton, S. W., & Mustanski, B. (2023). Biomedical and Behavioral Outcomes of 2GETHER: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Telehealth HIV Prevention Program for Young Male Couples. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 91(9), 505-520. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000823

O., A. M., & P., A. S. (2024). Bridging the Distance: Effective Communication and Honesty Among College Students in Romantic Long-Distance Relationships. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.14732

Parsakia, K., & Rostami, M. (2023). Digital Intimacy: How Technology Shapes Friendships and Romantic Relationships. AI and Tech in Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.aitech.1.1.5

Rostami, M., Saadati, N., Parsakia, K., & Gharibian, F. (2025). The Role of Love Languages in Enhancing Marital Communication. KMAN Counseling & Psychology Nexus, 3, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.fct.psynexus.3.14

Salarfard, M., Mahmoudinia, M., Rahimi, M., & Roudsari, R. L. (2025). A Systematic Review of Counselling Approaches and Their Impact on Marital Intimacy Among Women and Couples Experiencing Infertility. BMC psychology, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03430-4

Scott, S. B., Pulice-Farrow, L., Quyen, A., Brunett, K. M., & Balsam, K. F. (2023). Intimate Partner Violence in Transgender and Nonbinary Relationships: Actor-Partner Associations With Relationship Satisfaction, Dyadic Coping, and Partner Support. LGBT Health, 10(S1), S20-S27. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2023.0112

Spilt, J. L., Verschueren, K., Mirella, B. W. M. V. M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2022). Practitioner Review: Dyadic Teacher–child Relationships: Comparing Theories, Empirical Evidence and Implications for Practice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63(7), 724-733. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13573

Walter, I., Quehenberger, J., Landers, S., & Brisch, K. H. (2024). Attachment-Based Prevention Program Involving Mothers and Fathers: Seven-Year Post-Intervention Outcomes of a Randomized Control Trial. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 33(2), 538-553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-023-02762-2

Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Lu, C., Kwan, A. T., McIntyre, R. S., Yang, F., & Cao, B. (2024). The Psychological Factors Mediating/Moderating the Association Between Body‐image Disturbance and Depression: A Systematic Review. PsyCh Journal, 13(4), 527-540. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.754

Yang, Y. H., Chen, K., Liang, K., Du, W., Guo, J., & Du, L. (2024). Association Between Adult Attachment and Mental Health States Among Health Care Workers: The Mediating Role of Social Support. Frontiers in psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1330581

Yiğit, M. Ç., & Kabasakal, Z. (2022). The Role of Family Climates and Attachment Style in Romantic Relationship in Predicting Relation Role Expectations Among Adults. Journal of Social Research and Behavioral Sciences, 8(17), 621-651. https://doi.org/10.52096/jsrbs.8.17.36

Yurkiw, J., & Johnson, M. D. (2021). Perceived Stress, Supportive Dyadic Coping, and Sexual Communication in Couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(5), 1729-1737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407521996446

Zhang, C., Liu, B., Pawluski, J. L., Steinbusch, H. W., Kunikullaya, U. K., & Song, C. (2023). The Effect of Chronic Stress on Behaviors, Inflammation and Lymphocyte Subtypes in Male and Female Rats. Behavioural Brain Research, 439, 114220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2022.114220

Zitronblat, L. Z., & Dekel, R. (2021). Contribution of Mutual Perceived Support to the Marital Satisfaction of Combat Commander Couples. Journal of Military Veteran and Family Health, 7(s1), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.3138/jmvfh-2021-0034

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10

Submitted

2025-08-29

Revised

2025-11-12

Accepted

2025-11-21

How to Cite

Kavla , B. ., Sandıkçı , N. ., & Yüksel, M. . (2025). AI-Based Prediction of Intimacy Decline from Dyadic Attachment and Stress Patterns. Research and Practice in Couple Therapy, 3(4), 1-11. https://www.jrpct.com/index.php/rpct/article/view/52

Similar Articles

11-20 of 46

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.